Galaxy Unlocker Client Bootloader
This article is from the archive of our partner. The team over at is offering a pretty major bounty for the first person who is able to unlock the Samsung Galaxy S5 for rooting. Samsung, AT&T and Verizon won't offer a solution, and S5 owners are in their seventh week of waiting. This is basically seven years in the tech world, so fed up users pooled together their cash to. Right now, its at $17,970 and rising. You can get $10,055 for Verizon's version, $7,915 for AT&T, or all the loot for a solution to both providers.
Galaxy Unlocker Client Bootloader Manager
With root access, Galaxy S5 users can do a lot more cool stuff than their phone currently allows for; mainly the ability to install powerful apps and software. These things can allow users to do things like control battery usage, create automated backups, monitor the device remotely, and much more. Developers can even install their own custom version of the Android operating system. It is a seriously nifty feature to have, and especially important to the XDA-Developer community. Rooting requires an unlocked bootloader (that's a program that loads the operating system onto a device) or other exploit that allows the developer to gain access to the Android Operating System software. Monkey island keygen mac. ( Y ou really should be a developer if you're attempting a root, as one wrong move can disable your whole phone. Rooting your phone usually voids the warranty, too.) Verizon and AT&T locked the bootloader, so developers need someone to find an exploit.
Samsung does have the power to get through those locks, but is not sharing it with users. Other device makers, offer users directions as to how to get through those bootloader locks. Samsung also did not issue much of a comment on the matter, telling that they should contact Verizon and AT&T directly about the bootloaders. Earlier versions of the Galaxy and other devices have been unlocked in a matter of days, or even hours, but is proving to be a greater challenge. Considering how fast the bounty has grown, it's likely that users will figure out their own workaround before the carriers or maker offer a solution. This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.
B eneath the bland veneer of supermarket automation lurks an ugly truth: There’s a lot of shoplifting going on in the self-scanning checkout lane. But don’t call it shoplifting. The guys in loss prevention prefer “external shrinkage.” Self-checkout theft has become so widespread that a whole lingo has sprung up to describe its tactics.
Ringing up a T-bone ($13.99/lb) with a code for a cheap ($0.49/lb) variety of produce is “the banana trick.” If a can of Illy espresso leaves the conveyor belt without being scanned, that’s called “the pass around.” “The switcheroo” is more labor-intensive: Peel the sticker off something inexpensive and place it over the bar code of something pricey. Just make sure both items are about the same weight, to avoid triggering that pesky “unexpected item” alert in the bagging area. It’s a shame that the standard way of learning how to cook is by following recipes. To be sure, they are a wonderfully effective way to approximate a dish as it appeared in a test kitchen, at a star chef’s restaurant, or on TV. And they can be an excellent inspiration for even the least ambitious home cooks to liven up a weeknight dinner.
But recipes, for all their precision and completeness, are poor teachers. They tell you what to do, but they rarely tell you why to do it. This means that for most novice cooks, kitchen wisdom —a unified understanding of how cooking works, as distinct from the notes grandma lovingly scrawled on index-card recipes passed down through the generations —comes piecemeal. Take, for instance, the basic skill of thickening a sauce.
Maybe one recipe for marinara advises reserving some of the starchy pasta water, for adding later in case the sauce is looking a little thin. Another might recommend rescuing a too-watery sauce with some flour, and still another might suggest a handful of parmesan. Any one of these recipes offers a fix under specific conditions, but after cooking through enough of them, those isolated recommendations can congeal into a realization: There are many clever ways to thicken a sauce, and picking an appropriate one depends on whether there’s some leeway for the flavor to change and how much time there is until dinner needs to be on the table.
For years, the residents of Oxford, Massachusetts, seethed with anger at the company that controlled the local water supply. The company, locals complained, charged inflated prices and provided terrible service. But unless the town’s residents wanted to get by without running water, they had to pay up, again and again. The people of Oxford resolved to buy the company out. At a town meeting in the local high-school auditorium, an overwhelming majority of residents voted to raise the millions of dollars that would be required for the purchase. It took years, but in May 2014, the deal was nearly done: One last vote stood between the small town and its long-awaited goal. To hear more feature stories,.
The much-anticipated but much-delayed produced any number of Beckettian diversions over the last week, and for a good portion of the day on Thursday, attention focused on FBI Director Chris Wray and whether he might resign. In the wake of the FBI’s highly unusual public statement opposing the release of the memo (and placing it at odds with the White House), The Washington Post’s Matt Zapotosky an in which Wray was ready to resign over Bush-era surveillance overreaches, along with—wait for it—James Comey and Robert Mueller. CNN that White House aides were afraid Wray would resign if President Trump released the memo. Then NBC’s highly reliable Pete Williams cold water on it, saying Wray had no intention of stepping down.
The clinic permitted Paul Manafort one 10-minute call each day. And each day, he would use it to ring his wife from Arizona, his voice often soaked in tears. “Apparently he sobs daily,” his daughter Andrea, then 29, texted a friend. During the spring of 2015, Manafort’s life had tipped into a deep trough. A few months earlier, he had intimated to his other daughter, Jessica, that suicide was a possibility.
He would “be gone forever,” she texted Andrea. His work, the source of the status he cherished, had taken a devastating turn. For nearly a decade, he had counted primarily on a single client, albeit an exceedingly lucrative one.
He’d been the chief political strategist to the man who became the president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, with whom he’d developed a highly personal relationship. In 2011, a Maryland dog owner named Mali Vujanic uploaded He’d come home to find his two retrievers near an empty bag of cat treats. The first dog, a golden retriever, lounged calmly, her conscience seemingly clean.
But the second dog, a yellow Labrador named Denver, sat quaking in a corner, her eyes downcast, making what Vujanic called “her signature ‘I done it’ face.” Vujanic gasped at the apparent admission of guilt: “You did this!” Denver beat her tail nervously and grimaced. “You know the routine. In the kennel.” Obediently, the dog impounded herself. The video quickly garnered a flood of comments. Since then, “dog shaming” has become popular on Twitter and Instagram, as owners around the world post shots of their trembling pets beside notes in which the dogs seem to cop to bad behavior.
“0 days since the last toilet paper massacre,”; “I ate an extra large pepperoni pizza,”. Human enthusiasm for guilty dogs seems boundless: A 2013 landed on the New York Times best-seller list; Denver’s video has been viewed more than 50 million times. One Sunday, at one of our weekly salsa sessions, my friend Frank brought along a Danish guest.
I knew Frank spoke Danish well, since his mother was Danish, and he, as a child, had lived in Denmark. As for his friend, her English was fluent, as is standard for Scandinavians. However, to my surprise, during the evening’s chitchat it emerged that the two friends habitually exchanged emails using Google Translate. Frank would write a message in English, then run it through Google Translate to produce a new text in Danish; conversely, she would write a message in Danish, then let Google Translate anglicize it. Why would two intelligent people, each of whom spoke the other’s language well, do this? My own experiences with machine-translation software had always led me to be highly skeptical about it. But my skepticism was clearly not shared by these two.
Indeed, many thoughtful people are quite enamored of translation programs, finding little to criticize in them. This baffles me. On Friday, the House Intelligence Committee, which is chaired by Republican Representative Devin Nunes, released a four-page memo alleging surveillance abuses by the FBI. Earlier this week, Republicans on the committee to make the document public. The classified document has drawn criticism from Democratic lawmakers, who argue it is misleading, as well as from law enforcement officials. In a rare statement, the FBI against the document’s release, saying it had “grave concerns” about its accuracy.
Despite, the White House approved the release of the memo Friday. Below, read the memo in full.
January 18, 2018 To: HPSCI Majority Members From: HPSCI Majority Staff. Imagine a society in which you are rated by the government on your trustworthiness. Your “citizen score” follows you wherever you go. A high score allows you access to faster internet service or a fast-tracked visa to Europe.
If you make political posts online without a permit, or question or contradict the government’s official narrative on current events, however, your score decreases. To calculate the score, private companies working with your government constantly trawl through vast amounts of your social media and online shopping data. When you step outside your door, your actions in the physical world are also swept into the dragnet: The government gathers an enormous collection of information through the video cameras placed on your street and all over your city. If you commit a crime—or simply jaywalk—facial recognition algorithms will match video footage of your face to your photo in a national ID database. It won’t be long before the police show up at your door. Over the last two weeks, the maritime world has watched with horror as a tragedy has unfolded in the East China Sea.
A massive Iranian tanker, the Sanchi, collided with a Chinese freighter carrying grain. Damaged and adrift, the tanker caught on fire, burned for more than a week, and sank.
Android Bootloader Unlock Tool
All 32 crew members are presumed dead. Meanwhile, Chinese authorities and environmental groups have been posed by the million barrels of hydrocarbons that the tanker was carrying. Because the Sanchi was not carrying crude oil, but rather condensate, a liquid by-product of natural gas and some kinds of oil production. According to Alex Hunt, a technical manager at the London-based International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation, which assists with oil spills across the world, there has never been a condensate spill like this.